~ and you can't really help it. it has that sort of car-wreck fascination from which you just can't tear your eyes away. this has been my fodder for the last few nights. in the realms of the truly abhorrent.

for the [livejournal.com profile] 50bookchallenge:

no. 8. ~ Christmas with Robert E. Lee by Helen Topping Miller. i can't begin to imagine what compelled this author to pen such a wretched text. i was hoping for some treacle, but instead got a full-on helping of pathetic privation and disgrace (and endless pages of expository dialogue during which General Lee's children go on endlessly about stuff they all already know). man, this was a doozy: bad writing, a depressing, bad story, and some bizarre characterizationss. worse still, i have the sinking suspicion that everything in this slim volume was documented, right down to the Arlington carpets curled under against the wall because they were too big to fit at the shack at Washington College. i honestly couldn't tell if this was written to illicit sympathy for the Lees or in the spirit of some wicked schadenfreude. someone just spork my eyes out, please.

no. 9 ~ Madame Surratt: a drama in five acts by James Webb Rogers. oh. my. word. i'm not even sure i can begin to decribe this meta-theatrical pantheon of bad taste. the plot is inscrutable, the parade of random historical personages (including ~ oh wow ~ George Washington!) is bizarre (francis scott key and powhaten and patrick henry also make appearances ~ there is also an allegorical fantasy sequence, not quite but almost a ballet, in which actors representing the dissenting states comes back to the Union). honestly, i have no idea what to make of this mangled apologetic of southern honor that simultaneously damns the assassination and begs sympathy for its perpetrators. the dialogue is truly, pricelessly, dreadful: warbling Shakespearean monologues full of bombastic overbloated metaphors. this is my favorite exchange:

BOOTH: Richard the Third is on the boards to-night, and you shall learn the lesson while I play.

POWEL: Impossible, for I return to-night.

BOOTH: Whither?

POWEL: To my command.

BOOTH: Then wherefore did you come?
it is, in fact, so absolutely dreadful, i feel i must make use of it. immediately! i'm soooo working this in to my book somehow. if you would like to see for yourself this horror in all of its glory, feel free to read it online! (i love openlibrary.org).
and because we need an accompanying picture, here's something pretty and also slightly educational:



this carte-de-visite played a big role in the conspiracy trial.
it was found in the Surratt house with John Wilkes Booth's photograph
placed behind it. the prosecution kept trotting it out as
if it were some profound piece of evidence. it becomes an interesting
fixation during the course of the testimony.

anyway: it's Thursday and you know what that means? Update Day for Reconstruction. hopefully it's palate cleanser for inflicting bad books on you!

: D

From: [identity profile] lolocat.livejournal.com


I think we might have the Christmas with Robert Lee at work. I'll have to check when I get there because now I am intrigued. Not in a good way. In a shock value sort of way.

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


it's just a weird little awful book.

i love Christmas stories, no matter how corny. this one was just a trial.

hahahahahahaha ~

: D

From: [identity profile] minstrel-ivare.livejournal.com


Powhattan??? What could he possibly have to say about the Civil War??

And of course the Powell/Booth dialogue is priceless. Good god...

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


POWHATAN
Behold a king no jewel in his crown,
But feathered from his own imperial bird.
Powhatan salutes ye Minnehaha s Lord,
And Pocahontas father cheated of his child,
Who pined and perished in a foreign land-
Behold him standing where his fathers stood
Ere yet the canting Christian crushed his heart
Burnt down his wigwam, stole his child,
And murdered Minnehaha in her bed.
Truth hast thou told, for once, thou lying tongue:
"Upon ten thousand plains, fair flowers bloomed,
And o er them, like the billows of the sea,
Dashed the wild herd of plunging buffalo."
Those flowers, now drooping with papooses blood,
And slain, like buffalo, their warlike sires;
But chanting still their war songs as they died.
They cursed your friendship, and your power defied.
Well hast thou said, the waters laughed
Ah, yes, my Minnehaha; f are-thee-well !
Thou Laughing Water; f are-thee-well !
O, my Minnehaha! ha! ha! ha!

(Exit, sobbing. Exeunt Indians.}


um....yeah. i have no idea why he's in there.

hahahahahaha ~

From: [identity profile] redcoatcat.livejournal.com


So does historical fiction in 19th century inside flap start the same way as 18th century?
"Similar to the work of Don Juan and Tom Jones"

I found three books one day in a local boarders bookstore with that exact statement in it. XD

I really like how you colour this comic, mimicking photos from the time period is brilliant (I am presuming that is what you are doing)

=^,,^-

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


hahahaha ~ it is sometimes a little formal that way, but not as often. more often it will say (as many books nowadays do) something about the author's prior work: by the author of Moby Dick!

thanks on the coloring ~ ! yeah, i guess i am going for a pseudo-sepia sort of thing.

: D

From: [identity profile] utter-scoundrel.livejournal.com


Cod Shakespeare. I love it.

BOOTH: Sic semper, sirrah! (shoots Lincoln)

LINCOLN: Zounds, Mary! I am killed!

(Booth leaps to stage.)

GROUNDLING #1: There's a booth that has clearly toppled.

GROUNDLING #2: At least he's more entertaing than the first act.

BOOTH: The King's men! I must flee!

(Exits stage, pursued by a bear.)


...I must be stopped.

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


hahahahahahahahaha ~ played to perfection!

you need a line: "mary swoons". (or screams, as the case may be).

: D

From: [identity profile] romanticizing.livejournal.com


Wait, so why did they keep bringing up that cdv?

there is also an allegorical fantasy sequence, not quite but almost a ballet, in which actors representing the dissenting states comes back to the Union

Hahahaha. That is amazing.

And the first one reminds me of this BBC drama I saw about Nijinsky. I think every word to come out of his mouth was something he wrote in his diary (which he wrote way later than the year the show took place!), or some obscure ~foreshadowing~ to what would come later. I was left with the impression the writer just skimmed a biography of him rather than, you know, doing research.

(I've also read a few bizarre plays about Nijinsky, incidentally..)

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


re: the cdv ~ good question! it's sorta boggling! they call witness after witness to testify about the Surratts' southern sympathies and try to impress on the commission that they were obvious rabid secessionists because they had a picture of Booth in the house, along with some others of confederate generals (even though there were all sorts of pictures of all sorts of famous people, including Union generals, etc.). it would be like someone trotting out a book about Hitler from your library and saying: see ~ you are obviously a nazi!

so silly.

re Nijinsky: that's hilarious! sometimes those biopics are soooo superficial and embarrassing.

: D

From: [identity profile] romanticizing.livejournal.com


Weird. I wonder if people believed it. It looks like such a charming scene--the little girl and the dog especially. Haha, if they'd arrested everyone who had a picture of Booth, I think they'd have a lot of fangirls on their hands. I didn't even know they had pictures of Union generals! Is there a list somewhere of all the pictures they had?

I feel like I have to see every biopic made of someone I'm interested in. Like now I feel like I have to track down all those horrible Lincoln assassination movies. Especially if they're TV movies. I was watching this History channel thing about it and their Lewis Powell looked like 35 or something. And nothing like him. (Which was unfortunate because I was really looking forward to seeing how they portrayed him and all.)

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


no kidding about the arrests. in fact, even though a lot of people burned his picture or tore it out of their albums out of fear of having it around, it was still selling like hotcakes after the assassination (25¢ to Lincoln's 10¢ ~ and outstripping the dead president easily). the district police tried to put a stop to the sales, but couldn't. ha!

do you mean a list of the pictures that the Surratts had? i think they name a bunch back and forth during the trial, but i would have to double-check.

p.s. was that movie the one with Titus Welliver playing Powell? because yeah, he's about 20 years older and doesn't really resemble him in the slightest ~ hahahaha

: D

From: [identity profile] romanticizing.livejournal.com


25¢ to Lincoln's 10¢ ~ and outstripping the dead president easily

Hahahaha, wow. People are so weird :D That's great that they tried to stop sales of JWB's photos--like that would ever work! Or like they couldn't have been doing more important things, ha. I do wonder how many women burned letters or whatever from him. Kudos (understatement) to Isabel Sumner for keeping hers.

Oh, yeah, I meant a list of pictures the Surratts had--I'll just look at the trial transcript sometime.

Haha, the movie was actually this (http://www.history.com/minisite.do?content_type=Minisite_Generic&content_type_id=57330&display_order=2&mini_id=1074). It was based on Kauffman's book (yay!) and had some ridiculously cheesy historic reenactments (my favorite). Their JWB was sadly unattractive. Their Atzerodt looked kinda like him, though. And their Willie Jett was kind of adorable.

I think I might have to check out that TV movie Titus Welliver was in, though--have you seen it? How was it?

We should have a movie review day on [livejournal.com profile] jwb1865 :D

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


wow ~ that history channel site has some really bizarre videos on there. the cheesy factor is off the charts, and what's with the whole: Powell misfiring on Seward and then bludgeoning him with the pistol ~ hahahahahaha. that's wretched! and they call themselves a "history" channel? yikes!

: D

pretty much all of the assassination movies thus far have been laughably bad. i fear for Manhunt. in fact, the reason i started working on an assassination project of my own was because i was so fed up with how bad it's been portrayed in most fictional adaptations.

From: [identity profile] romanticizing.livejournal.com


Haha, I know, right? The Powell misfiring on Seward thing was extremely weird. In the program, they say in a voiceover that Powell went down the stairs and then turned and went back up them, but on screen we just see him messing around upstairs. And I was SO MAD they didn't show his weird hat when he entered Mrs. Surratt's :( (No pickaxe, either!)

Maybe I will take screencaps later and post them because it was so amusingly bad.

I think I have to see that movie you mentioned because Jeremy Sisto plays Frederick Seward. That is a good enough reason for me.

Is Manhunt really happening? I wonder. After I read it, and found out they were making it into a film, I was confused for a while and then started daydreaming into if I were making it, how I would do it. Then I read American Brutus and realized making a movie of that would be like 100000x harder than making a movie of Manhunt and gave up because of all of Swanson's weirdness I had issues with.

I read somewhere they were considering Will Kemp for JWB and I love him. He's primarily a dancer but he's doing mostly acting now. He could so look like JWB, too. (I fear of a Manhunt with an ugly JWB.)

And it's awesome of you to do your own -- I'd certainly love to see it more than some random stupid Hollywood version.

From: (Anonymous)

I love you lj...you are da bomb ...totally spiffy...


(I'm buttering up lj so it will let me post)


Wow. Geo. Washington in a book about Mrs Surratt [sputter/eye roll/gag]The bit of dialogue between Booth and Powell is awfully funny though. ;-)

The Lee book sounds so awful...I hate the idea of Lee as an object of pity (sympathy, ok. pity, NO) What's a "schadenfreude"?

Hope you're reading something better now--sounds like you need a bit of a brain cleanse.

moo

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com

Re: I love you lj...you are da bomb ...totally spiffy...


schadenfreude is when you gloat over someone else's misfortune ~ in this case, it would be writing a mock sympathy for someone you dislike to show them at their lowest, weakest point.

i don't think that's what the book intended, but that's how it comes off. yuck.

and i agree, Lee needs no pity. nor does he have anything to apologize for in my book. he did the best he could given his limited choices.

i'm back to reading research (which is in some ways better, some ways worse) ~ hahahahahaha.

: D
.