last night i was so dead from a long day working and class and cooking for nine (for today), that i settled in to watch, yes, an animated film: Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron.

i like horse stories. I read all the Chincotegues and Black Beauty and Justin Morgan and secretly had a yen for My Little Ponies though by the time they came out, i was too old to seriously want one (and looking back i wonder: what was i thinking anyway?). i secretly envied my cousin's vast collection of Breyers.

but back to the movie: this one had some possibilities artwise, but is crippled by an overuse of very uneven cgi (some scenes are well executed and others, like one in which a train falls down a mountain) just look like crap. the hans zimmer score is decent, but the bryan adams songs don't do much for it. loved the color palette for the film. i'll give it that. i could probably look at it all day. i also had to look up whether the model for the horse was Jersey (who played Cisco in Dances with Wolves), but it wasn't. i've always liked buckskins with black points.

anyway, storywise the movie is poor. it's also the worst kind of revisionist, relativistic pc side-taking ~ something i like to call an overindulgence in "white swinery". this is the gratuitous premise that all white men are evil and dirty and greedy. it's a very obstinate, myopic view of western expansion as entirely genocidal and that the army is populated with the worst of the worst, without any basis in reason (Dances with Wolves goes this route, as does Glory to some extent ~ and countless other films that get carried away with trying to depict racism, which is why a film like Crash is so amazing. i think it finally gets it right).

now, i'll be the first to admit that i have indulged in this sort of depiction in my own writing from time to time because i have strong feelings about the evil aspects of Manifest Destiny and the native genocide in this country which ought to be criticized. i wrote a 900 page novel that was so steeped in white-swinery it made me sick to read it ~ i mean, where's the hope of salvation if all conquering nations are just pigs? nothing excuses the behavior of white soldiers in the west, but a little education will go a long way to explain it (even if its in terms we would have a very difficult time conceiving of by modern standards).

so there's got to be some balance somewhere and this film is not only not going to present that balance, but it takes the lopsidedness one further (and this, i think, is where it really fails). Spirit, the titular horse is captured by white swine, refuses to be broken by cruel soldiers, but eventually forms a bond with an young oppressed Lakota (because indians didn't use horses as pack animals or tether them if need be, or saddle them, etc. ~ yeah, that and there's a bridge for sale in frisco.)

in the end, Spirit doesn't trade in his freedom for domesticity, but the rosy conclusion leaves you daftly feeling like nothing has been resolved except that the horse has affected his escape and brought a girl horse along with him. not sure how this makes him a hero. his blowing up the train isn't going to stop the railroad. honestly, what in the world is the message of this story? fleeting victory is sufficient? it's been a long long time since i've seen the disney film Comanche (which for some reason begs a comparison even though they only really have a horse caught between two worlds in common), but as a child i firmly recall it being a lot more fair-handed (i could be wrong, but that was my impression then).

i know some of you will think i am overanalyzing this, but kids aren't stupid and the mixed (and categorically biased) messages in this film are confounding, misleading, and as superficial as that crusty dead skin that those little microbes eat off your face every night.

and that's why i give this one a 7 for the visuals and 3 for the rest of it.



happy happy horsie
Tags:

From: [identity profile] lanyn.livejournal.com


Oh man! You just brought back so many memories... I remember that Disney film, except I remember it being called Tonka. It was also fictionalized in one of my Disney books, and I used to read it over and over! The book didn't have pictures from the movie, it had drawings, but I loved them.

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


it was called Tonka! thank you for the correction.

and oh my word, i think we had the same illustrated book ~ hahahahaha ~

the scene of the indian boy throwing rocks at that horse trying to make it run away has stuck with me all of my days. it made me cry when i was a kid.

: D

From: [identity profile] utter-scoundrel.livejournal.com


"as superficial as that crusty dead skin that those little microbes eat off your face every night. "

that's all i'll be able to think about when i go to bed tonight. thanks for that!

:P

From: [identity profile] layne67.livejournal.com

Off-topic


Hi. You don't know me but I need to find out something and I hope you can help. I'm on a quest actually, to find out who/what Montmorency is, to answer a friend's question. Googling is hopeless, there are so many montmorencies around! So my next step is to ask the people who listed 'Montmorency' as one of their interests and find the common denominator. Help, please? :)

btw, I love that movie. Watched it because of Matt Damon actually.

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com

Re: Off-topic


this is the montmorency i listed in my interests: here (http://www.amazon.com/Montmorency-Thief-Liar-Gentleman/dp/0439580358)

hope that helps! either way, i recommend updale's series highly.

: D

p.s. i am guessing the most common use of the word come from the commune in france (home of rousseau, i believe) ~ you can read about it here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montmorency,_Val-d'Oise)

From: [identity profile] layne67.livejournal.com

Re: Off-topic


Thanks a lot! And I'll look up that book. It does sound very interesting :)
sparowe: (Default)

From: [personal profile] sparowe


I remember everyone telling me that I "had" to go see this movie--I guess once you like horses, you're doomed to be pushed to every film. Well, I didn't go, I never felt the draw... and you make me rather glad of it, I think!

From: [identity profile] ryan-howse.livejournal.com


Hey, I'm not the only one who hates Dances With Wolves for that reason!

I have little desire to watch most horse films, but you're right about the inanity of these revisionist colonial films. They tend not to reflect real native culture so much as white interpretations of the culture, with a healthy dose of guilt. Worse, they're rarely relevant to current events--it happened so long ago that it's whitewashing their modern plights with dredged up pseudo-history.

In conclusion, I will probably also have nightmares about the microbes.

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


hahahahaha ~ and i will have nightmares about your avatar ~ what the heck is that! (looks like someone's angry chewed gum).

i think history is so relevant (the past is never past says faulkner and i believe it) ~ but when people mess with it to the point of reinventing it and/or whitewashing and/or revising it, it loses the power to show us how we're just making the same mistakes all over again (and again and again).

in this way, we're doomed by our own cultural "sensitivity", i think.

From: [identity profile] ryan-howse.livejournal.com


The icon is the evil brain-in-a-jar named Krang that was one of the villains from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

From: [identity profile] astamaria.livejournal.com


I was also quite disappointed with Spirit...it looked like it had a lot of potential, but in the end it disappoints. And I agree with your assessment of the "white swinery". Come on, there wasn't a even one kind white soldier, or at least one not completely brutal? Give me a break.

And if I remember correctly, I think Custer was one of the soldiers abusing Spirit. I am so sick of the whole Custer-as-villain aspect that keeps popping up in modern westerns. In my opinion, it's one of the most tired, boring, overused cliches out there. **yawns**Surely there are writers out there who have enough creativity to come up with a new villain! Or at least do their research and come up with a historical figure who was just as bad, or worse.

From: [identity profile] lookingland.livejournal.com


it wasn't actually custer, but they sure designed the character to evoke custer ~ who i don't believe would've ever treated a horse that way (autie had his faults and could even be a major ass, but yeah, i'm sick of the custer=bad guy thing too).

it's even more intellectually insulting that after he tries to break the horse and then chases him and the indian to the edge of the world that he then decides to let them go (for no apparent reason whatsoever).

dum dum dum.

.