i went to see The Prestige yesterday. i feel very ambivolent about most of it, so i won't bother trying to articulate my opinion too deeply. no spoilers here (i don't think).
the short impression: it was entertaining. it was predictable. it broke one of the canons of storytelling in a way that i think might have worked in the book, but not on film. it's mostly unmemorable (except for David Bowie, who kicked major butt ~ that man gets cooler all the time). though the two movies are nothing alike, this one begs a comparison with The Illusionist. i think this one can beg all it likes. the former is the superior film. i want to stress that The Prestige is highly entertaining. it just suffers from weak character development and a bend in reality that's both fascinating and disappointing.

science, magic, and illusion are all relative here
afterwards J and i went to B & N because she had coupons and i had a gift certificate and after some green tea chai and a double chocolate cupcake, i was so jacked on sugar, i bought Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle.
the books weigh about 11 pounds. there's over 3,700 pages between them. apparently they clock in around 2 million words. perhaps needless to say, but i dunna expect to finish them for the
50bookchallenge.

part of why i bought them was because i wanted to see how they sustain. the reviews on the second part of the cycle were middling (it suffered, they say, from excessiveness and rambling ~ but then what sequel doesn't?). but apparenty, for those intrepid fans who went on to third installment, everything pays off in spectacular ways ~ and that's what i want to see.
(insert long ramble about this idea i had about how to solve the world's problems through story structure).
and that's about all i have energy for this morning ~ my head is too busy spinning on the axis of ideas.
happy sunday all ~ !
: D
the short impression: it was entertaining. it was predictable. it broke one of the canons of storytelling in a way that i think might have worked in the book, but not on film. it's mostly unmemorable (except for David Bowie, who kicked major butt ~ that man gets cooler all the time). though the two movies are nothing alike, this one begs a comparison with The Illusionist. i think this one can beg all it likes. the former is the superior film. i want to stress that The Prestige is highly entertaining. it just suffers from weak character development and a bend in reality that's both fascinating and disappointing.

science, magic, and illusion are all relative here
afterwards J and i went to B & N because she had coupons and i had a gift certificate and after some green tea chai and a double chocolate cupcake, i was so jacked on sugar, i bought Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle.
the books weigh about 11 pounds. there's over 3,700 pages between them. apparently they clock in around 2 million words. perhaps needless to say, but i dunna expect to finish them for the
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)

part of why i bought them was because i wanted to see how they sustain. the reviews on the second part of the cycle were middling (it suffered, they say, from excessiveness and rambling ~ but then what sequel doesn't?). but apparenty, for those intrepid fans who went on to third installment, everything pays off in spectacular ways ~ and that's what i want to see.
(insert long ramble about this idea i had about how to solve the world's problems through story structure).
and that's about all i have energy for this morning ~ my head is too busy spinning on the axis of ideas.
happy sunday all ~ !
: D
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
i found myself not rooting for anyone by the time it got down to the last set of turns.
i don't think any story can afford to have its audience stop caring about who wins or loses or why before the fat lady sings.
From:
I love neal stephenson!
From:
Re: I love neal stephenson!
: D
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
maybe as a precusor to tackling Pyncheon.
: D
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
: D