I thought I better turn in my "I saw the new Star Trek movie report. This is generally spoiler-free.

First off, I can't imagine how difficult it is for an actor to play another actor's character. while there's a little bit of room for doing your own thing, it's the moments when you nail it that it really works. Zachary Quinto was phenomenal as a different kind of Spock (though I confess: at first I had a hard time seeing him as anyone but Sylar from Heroes). Chris Pine was okay as Kirk. The final scene was the only real moment of recognition for me, though there were other moments where he was really trying. McCoy was dead-on in some moments, less so in others. Scotty was also excellent. I feel more ambivalent about Chekov (the voice was spot-on, but the hair was distracting), Sulu (generally good, but nothing particularly amazing), and Uhura (I think they felt the need to "empower" the character; she looked great, but I didn't feel a connection; also, there's some plot stuff with her that's maybe too weird).

The plot is good, but gives lots of room to complain. Some of it is a little facile and silly (but then so was the TV show). I think the writers wanted to create something new without violating the canon). I think they succeeded (and what a monumental task, considering!). There were a few things here and there that I snerfed at, but overall it was a rollicking good ride, lots of stuff blew up, there was plenty of good humor, and it was an opportunity for a new adventure with characters I love. A lot of it is origin stuff, so I'd like to see a sequel, though this is the last Star Trek that will ever feature Majel Barrett (she's in every incarnation of the show ever made). And who knows how long Leonard Nimoy will last. His role in this was just right and exactly needed to make the passing of the baton work.

Die-hards will likely call foul on many a detail, but I've always been an easy fan (which is why I never liked Next Generation: it was too snobby for my goofy "space western" tastes).

It's worth a watch whether you're an old fan or never even saw an episode in all your life. That's a pretty major accomplishment, so overall I give it the thumbs up.

: D
Tags:

From: [personal profile] catknutsson


I'm hoping to go see this tomorrow night - looks like fun! Stuff blowing up - yay!
worldof_wonders: (!john dental office 1872)

From: [personal profile] worldof_wonders


Greetings. May I ask how you found me? You are interested in 18th century dentistry? The number of others I have encountered interested in that subject = 0. I see you are doing a civil war project. And something with Razi-el. The secret of God. These tie in with the work I am doing, or have been doing, or am postponing, about Doc Holliday. How interesting...
worldof_wonders: (!john a is for alveolar process)

From: [personal profile] worldof_wonders


Well Razi-el himself ties in only tangentially. Doc Holliday (I call him John) is accompanied by Gabriel, the Angel of Death. So Razi-el is naturally Gabriel's brother. But I know him because I was reading about angels. I liked your picture of him. I also do artwork, but it is very sporadic. I do it as needed, rather than as vocation so I don't think I've listed it as an interest either.

Tell me more about the dentistry? I've read (and remembered) Harris' Principles and Practices of Dentistry. It was thorough and excellent. I also have read (and remembered) Fox's The Natural History of the Human Teeth and The History and Treatments of the Diseases of the Teeth the Gums and the Alveolar Process, which John must have surely used for his thesis (on Diseases of the Teeth as you almost certainly know.) Other books I have read were about 18th century dentistry, rather than being texts of the time themselves.
.

Profile

lookingland: (Default)
lookingland

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags