lookingland (
lookingland) wrote2008-02-06 07:01 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
just a picture and somesuch ~
the caption on these mugshots reads: "In 1904 Claude Hankins , aged 14, was convicted of murder and paroled after serving four years." it's always shocking to me, how little 14 really is. this boy is clearly still a child and you can't help wonder at who he killed and why ~ and the circumstances in which he lived that made it possible for someone so young to commit such a serious crime. of course, this is new york, where they start down a bad path pretty young in the slums and life expectancy is pretty low ~ so on the other hand, i guess it shouldn't surprise me. but it still does.

child murderers especially disturb me for some reason. maybe because when i was a child i knew what the impulse to kill was like. maybe because all that really separated me from them is social class and a paper and pencil with which to vent my frustrations. that might be too telling ~ hahahahahaha.
meanwhile, i'm working. very slowly it appears. trying to get my brain wrapped around where to go after the Prologue with the capital P. i feel the need to post something as evidence that i am actually working and not just dwibbling in the myre. so here's a lamp. you know you love it. i made it especially for you.


child murderers especially disturb me for some reason. maybe because when i was a child i knew what the impulse to kill was like. maybe because all that really separated me from them is social class and a paper and pencil with which to vent my frustrations. that might be too telling ~ hahahahahaha.
meanwhile, i'm working. very slowly it appears. trying to get my brain wrapped around where to go after the Prologue with the capital P. i feel the need to post something as evidence that i am actually working and not just dwibbling in the myre. so here's a lamp. you know you love it. i made it especially for you.

no subject
Still there's something deeply disturbing about those two shots.
no subject
: o p
definitely disturbing
(Anonymous) 2008-02-06 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)It'd be neat to look Claude up in the 1900 census. Sadly, I don't have a resource any more.
I like your sketch...what's included in it.
moo
Re: definitely disturbing
: D
I couldn't resist ...
(Anonymous) 2008-02-06 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)She found a Claude F. Hankins born in Alameda Calif. about 1890 who served time at 14 in San Quentin (nothing of this is NEW YORK) was paroled in 1914 (which means he served TEN years) married and had children by the 1920 census and died in Seattle Washington in 1965. I haven't received the copies of the info. so I can't check for more details yet but it's nice to know he went on to have a family and live a fairly long life.
moo--researchaholic
Re: I couldn't resist ...
anyway, as you said, it's nice to hope that hankins got out of prison and had a semi-nice life thereafter, whatever may have been the cause of his crime (i'm going to dream up for him an abusive stepfather who beat his mother and who he stuck like a pig ~ just because).
: D
no subject
no subject
: D
The photograph
(Anonymous) 2009-04-29 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: The photograph
i had since done some investigating and currently have a friend who's actually pulled the trial transcripts, etc. just to see what the story is. very interesting stuff! and sadder still for knowing more of the facts. the good news is, he seems to have been a productive citizen after his stint in the can ~ married, had children, held a long-term job, etc.
thanks again for your comment!
: D