it's the "killing more men in two hours than all the previous wars put together" that i'm quibbling with. yes, Gettysburg was a bigger bloodbath over its three-day spread, but Antietam was the two hour bloodbath that caused more casualties than all the previous wars put together.
says the total geek.
i'm not a stats freak, but some Civil War stuff sticks in your head and stays there ~ and for me this is one of those things. hahahahahaha ~
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: I read this...
Date: 2007-09-26 12:38 pm (UTC)says the total geek.
i'm not a stats freak, but some Civil War stuff sticks in your head and stays there ~ and for me this is one of those things. hahahahahaha ~
you din't say what you thought of the book!
: D