<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634</id>
  <title>LookingLand</title>
  <subtitle>Par grâce! Quelle charité!</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>lookingland</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2012-01-29T19:12:43Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="lookingland" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:297742</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/297742.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=297742"/>
    <title>say goodbye to january (among other things) ~</title>
    <published>2012-01-29T19:12:43Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-29T19:12:43Z</updated>
    <category term="desk"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>2</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">apparently there has been yet more brouhaha at lj (i post from dreamwidth.org in case you didn't realize it). while i have not yet decided to return to any kind of regular blogging, i may quit cross-posting. if you have a dreamwidth account, look me up. otherwise, i think, at long last, this is truly goodbye lj. i'm glad i didn't buy a permanent account when i was tempted. haven't really bothered seeking people out on dreamwidth or plugging into any communities, etc. like i said, i don't know how often i may post or if this too will all just go away. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;but enough of the doom and gloom. hope everyone is having a productive sunday. i know i have lots of writing to do. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and on that note, behold:&amp;nbsp;the state of my desk (it's been a long time, hasn't it?).&amp;nbsp; the &amp;quot;clean space&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;below is more generally occupied by my tea kettle, so the desk is still pretty cluttered, but it's a good working space. i find i paint better these days using a clipboard and watching movies, so i moved all the art stuff over to the side where the computer sits (at the other desk). the writing area i am trying to keep pretty simple:&amp;nbsp;i have my outline for reference, my notebooks to write in, and an assortment of pens and whatnots. my research books are banned from the desktop except on a need-to-read basis. i find as my hands grow more cripply with arthritis the writing slope is a big help in keeping me from pinching my wrist, which is what i tend to do when i write flat. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/9786/desk01282012.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=297742" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:297283</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/297283.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=297283"/>
    <title>Starting off 2012 with Patrick O'Brian</title>
    <published>2012-01-07T14:37:35Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-07T17:33:05Z</updated>
    <category term="reading"/>
    <category term="aubrey/maturin"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;&lt;img alt="" src="http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/2738/mandc.jpg" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;I am amazed at how much time I used to put into blogging. Wish I could say that it explains why I&amp;nbsp;never got anything done, but then what would my current excuse be?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;At any rate, I am tentatively returning to the blogosphere. Mostly at my &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lookingland.com/reconstruction.php"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Reconstruction&lt;/em&gt; website&lt;/a&gt;, where I&amp;nbsp;will b&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;e cross-nattering endlessly about the Civil War and other 19th Century-related topics, but possibly also here where I can natter about books and movies perhaps.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last year I endeavored to read Zola's &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rougon-Macquart_Series"&gt;Rougon-Macquar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rougon-Macquart_Series"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;t&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rougon-Macquart_Series"&gt; series&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; I&amp;nbsp;got through the first 7 books and half of the 8th, but then had to take a break (&lt;em&gt;L'Assommoir&lt;/em&gt; was just too much ~&amp;nbsp;sooo good, but man, what a depressing book). Late in the year, for reasons I can't explain, I decided I&amp;nbsp;would like to read Patrick O'Brian's &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey%E2%80%93Maturin_series"&gt;Aubrey/Maturin series&lt;/a&gt;. So I&amp;nbsp;picked up &lt;em&gt;Master and Commander&lt;/em&gt; over the Thanksgiving holiday and now I&amp;nbsp;am just shy of halfway through book number 4. &amp;nbsp; A quick catch-up on my opinion of the series [from my &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/649719-boots"&gt;Goodreads account&lt;/a&gt;]:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;u&gt;Master and Commander&lt;/u&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="readable reviewText"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;Other reviewers have likened O'Brian to Jane Austen ~ but with battleships. I get the comparison.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can appreciate the  wealth of historical detail and the slavish attention to all things nautical, but this first novel is sadly lacking in things  like, well, plot, for one.  And yes, Stephen and Jack are charming and  there are some genuinely wonderful moments, but I felt exasperated waiting for something to happen. How can a book so  chock-full of battles be so wanderingly aimless?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I didn't hate this, but neither was I  madly in love with it. This was just so-so; impeded by strange choices in the  pacing, truly bizarre dialogue at times (and I don't even mean the  period vernacular ~ I mean it felt like the writer was paying  no attention as to whether a reader could make context out of  random snippets), and again, an odd plotlessness in which the setup never pays off and the final battle is  just a 50-page denouement. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;u&gt;Post Captain&lt;/u&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;                                                   &lt;span class="readable reviewText"&gt;                                          &lt;span style="display: none;"&gt;this  second book is a stronger effort in my estimation. there appears to be a  more cohesive plot (or set of plots, really). so generally i enjoyed it  much more than Master and Commander, though it still had its  detractions and plenty of aimless boat boat boat blah blah blah kind of  stuff that i occasionally skimmed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stephen was kind of weird in  this one (and getting on my nerves as a result). he comes off very Mary  Sue in this novel with O'Brian attempting to temper his awesomeness by c&lt;a class="actionLinkLite" href="http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17768.Post_Captain#"&gt;...more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;this  second book is a stronger effort in my estimation. there appears to be a  more cohesive plot (or set of plots, really). Generally I enjoyed it  much more than &lt;em&gt;Master and Commander&lt;/em&gt;, though it still had its  detractors and plenty of aimless boat boat boat blah blah blah kind of  stuff that I occasionally skimmed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stephen was kind of weird in  this one (and getting on my nerves as a result). He comes off very Mary  Sue ~ with O'Brian attempting to temper his awesomeness by  constantly referring to him as &amp;quot;reptilian&amp;quot; ~ but i don't buy it. I actually enjoyed my time with Jack much more this go round, though the  two of them together continue to be pretty awesome. There were numerous  interactions that were comic gold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And Pullings is just adorable. He desperately needs more page time.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;HMS&amp;nbsp;Surprise&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; best  so far of the series. Stephen is much less weird and bitchy in this one  (perhaps torture humbles him a bit), and it feels so much less all over  the place than the previous two; there's an actual plot with some  over-arching complications, and an ending satisfying enough that were  this the only book O'Brian penned, it would have been just fine. I am  almost afraid to be disappointed with the series moving forward, but  move forward I shall. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;A handful of bits out of this were borrowed to plot the Weir film  adaptation. I am grateful that the film didn't bother trying to include  either Diana or Stephen's intelligence agent storylines ~ the former I  hope to be done with and the latter really feels more like an intrusive  (and convenient) plot device. Also, lovesick stephen was mercifully restrained (I thought I would hate it, but it was just right), while lovesick Jack was hilariously adorable. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;As was Mr. Pullings, who once again did not receive sufficient page time.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ *&amp;nbsp;~&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;p.s. I&amp;nbsp;realize there is a whole subculture out there of Aubrey/Maturin slash fandom (and had the misfortune of encountering some of it in my trawl for an image for this post). I&amp;nbsp;seriously have to wonder whether people who go there with this series have ever bothered to actually read the bloody thing ~ beh.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=297283" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:297029</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/297029.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=297029"/>
    <title>30 Days Book Meme in a Day</title>
    <published>2011-11-08T14:14:04Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-08T14:22:25Z</updated>
    <category term="reading"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/2401/homephotobooks.jpg"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style="text-align: left;"&gt;i realize you are supposed to take this one day at a time and expound on your responses, but i haven't got the patience or discipline for that, so here it goes:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 01 &amp;ndash; The best book you&amp;rsquo;ve read in the last year&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;right now it's a battle between Emile Zola's &lt;em&gt;The Sin of Father Mouret&lt;/em&gt; and Don Robertson's &lt;em&gt;By Antietam Creek&lt;/em&gt;. It's been a good year, so this is a tough call. I love both books for different reasons.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 02 &amp;ndash; A book that you&amp;rsquo;ve read more than 3 times&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;em&gt;Coming through Slaughter&lt;/em&gt; by Michael Ondaatje jumps to mind first. this book changed the way i approach writing and i often return to it just to dip my toes in that inspiration.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 03 &amp;ndash; Your favourite series&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;not much of a series readers. the&lt;em&gt; Montmorency&lt;/em&gt; books by Eleanor Updale are perhaps my favorite?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 04 &amp;ndash; Your favourite book of your favourite series&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Montmorency on the Rocks&lt;/em&gt; (which is Book 2). not sure how a book about a drug-addict thief and dead babies made it to through the editors of children's books, but i am sure glad it did.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 05 &amp;ndash; A book that makes you happy&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Romance of Rosy Ridge&lt;/em&gt; by MacKinley Kantor. i think i smiled through the whole thing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 06 &amp;ndash; A book that makes you sad&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;em&gt;The Judas Field&lt;/em&gt; by Howard Bahr. i applaud his tough choices, but this one made me very sad with regard to what happens to the characters.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 07 &amp;ndash; Most underrated book&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;probably everything i have already named would qualify. i would add S. Weir Mitchell's &lt;em&gt;Far in the Forest&lt;/em&gt;, which, though a bit overwritten, is just a great story.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 08 &amp;ndash; Most overrated book&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;anything by J.K. Rowling.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 09 &amp;ndash; A book you thought you wouldn&amp;rsquo;t like but ended up loving&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Coming through Slaughter&lt;/em&gt; by Michael Ondaatje. it was given to me by a friend and i thought: gack, what do i care about some jazz trumpeter from the 20s? despite being totally out of my element, the book blew me away. also, &lt;em&gt;The Red Badge of Courage&lt;/em&gt; by Stephen Crane. refused to read it in high school. couldn't stop reading it in college.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 10 &amp;ndash; Your favourite classic book&lt;/strong&gt;: depending on my mood it's either&lt;em&gt; Les Miserables&lt;/em&gt; by Victor Hugo, &lt;em&gt;The Count of Monte Cristo&lt;/em&gt; by Alexander Dumas, &lt;em&gt;The Red Badge of Courage&lt;/em&gt; by Stephen Crane, or &lt;em&gt;Ulysses&lt;/em&gt; by James Joyce.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 11 &amp;ndash; A book you hated&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;For Whom the Bell Tolls&lt;/em&gt; by Ernest Hemingway. no commentary. i could run a long list here, but it's kind of a drag of a question. would rather focus on the good stuff!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 12 &amp;ndash; A book you used to love but don&amp;rsquo;t anymore&lt;/strong&gt;: this is a more interesting question. i loved loved loved &lt;em&gt;The Talisman&lt;/em&gt; by Stephen King and Peter Straub when i first read it. in the last decade i tried going back to it and couldn't get past chapter one. weird.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 13 &amp;ndash; Your favourite writer&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;can't really say i have one. maybe Alan Moore, but that's a strange choice. i do love, without exception, everything by Stephen Crane, so maybe he qualifies.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 14 &amp;ndash; Your favourite book of your favourite writer&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;from Alan Moore it's &lt;em&gt;From Hell&lt;/em&gt;. From Stephen Crane it's&lt;em&gt; The Red Badge of Courage&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 15 &amp;ndash; Favourite male character&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;Javert and/or Valjean from &lt;em&gt;Les Miserables&lt;/em&gt; are the first, most obvious choices. i would add Roland Deschain from Stephen King's&lt;em&gt; Dark Tower&lt;/em&gt; series of the more recent things that i have read. he is absolutely priceless.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 16 &amp;ndash; Favourite female character&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;probably Eponine from &lt;em&gt;Les Miserables&lt;/em&gt;. women characters are tough for me. maybe Jo March from Alcott's &lt;em&gt;Little Women&lt;/em&gt;? how sad is that?&amp;nbsp;i can't even think of any.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 17 &amp;ndash; Favourite quote from your favourite book&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;geh? too brain dead to even produce such a thing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 18 &amp;ndash; A book that disappointed you&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;most anything by Neal Gaimen has disappointed me, some of &lt;em&gt;Sandman&lt;/em&gt; being the exception. &lt;em&gt;The Silent&lt;/em&gt; by Jack Dann was hugely disappointing (and has the infamy of being the reason i almost never buy new books at full price). also, Geraldine Brook's &lt;em&gt;March&lt;/em&gt; gave me cause to quibble. i will also throw in Pat Conroy's &lt;em&gt;Prince of Tides&lt;/em&gt;, which is an amazing book save for the final page. i gave it as a gift once and cut out the offending matter, but once read, you can't unread things, alas.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 19 &amp;ndash; Favourite book turned into a movie&lt;/strong&gt;: incidentally turned into a movie or does the movie have to be good too? oddly, the one that leaps to mind is &lt;em&gt;Bambi&lt;/em&gt; by Felix Salten. also&lt;em&gt; Trainspotting&lt;/em&gt; by Irvine Welsh. just because i think these are good adaptations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 20 &amp;ndash; Favourite romance book&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;not a genre i read, but &lt;em&gt;The Romance of Rosy Ridge&lt;/em&gt; by MacKinley Kantor would count, i suppose. also, i would include &lt;em&gt;Silk&lt;/em&gt; by Alessandro Barrico.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 21 &amp;ndash; Favourite book from your childhood&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Where the Wild Things Are&lt;/em&gt; by Maurice Sendak. also &lt;em&gt;Bambi&lt;/em&gt; by Felix Salten.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 22 &amp;ndash; Favourite book you own&lt;/strong&gt;: i own most of my favorite books, so assuming the question is asking about the artifact rather than the text itself, i would have to choose non-fiction items:&lt;em&gt; Lincoln and Episodes of War&lt;/em&gt; by William E. Doster, and &lt;em&gt;John Wilkes Booth Himself &lt;/em&gt;by Richard Gutman. also i would throw in &lt;em&gt;Photographic Atlas of Civil War Injuries&lt;/em&gt; by Bradley Bengston &amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;Julian Kutz. there are others. i am choosing these because they are rare (and pricey) birds.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 23 &amp;ndash; A book you&amp;rsquo;ve wanted to read for a long time but still haven&amp;rsquo;t&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;i &amp;quot;save&amp;quot; books on purpose when i know an author only has limited work available. included on my save self are books by S. Weir Mitchell, Don Robertson, and Howard Bahr. one day it will rain and i will have wondrous things to read!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 24 &amp;ndash; A book that you wish more people would&amp;rsquo;ve read&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;i wish more people would read the authors i have mentioned throughout this list. but if i had to pick one, i wish more people would read Don Robertson. he is a lost gem (and he doesn't just write about the civil war). of the living authors, i wish more people would read Eleanor Updale. she is totally underrated.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 25 &amp;ndash; A character who you can relate to the most&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;most everyone in &lt;em&gt;Les Miserables &lt;/em&gt;(except Marius and Cosette because they are silly ~ sorta like this question).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 26 &amp;ndash; A book that changed your opinion about something&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;Saint Ignatius of Loyola's &lt;em&gt;Spiritual Exercises&lt;/em&gt;. also his letters.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 27 &amp;ndash; The most surprising plot twist or ending&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;not sure it was a surprise, really, but wow it did me in anyway:&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;Prayer for the Dying&lt;/em&gt; by Stuart O'Nan. also Jerzy Kozinski's &lt;em&gt;The Painted Bird&lt;/em&gt;. hooo boy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 28 &amp;ndash; Favourite title&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Coming through Slaughter&lt;/em&gt; by Michael Ondaatje. i loved this title so much i named my second novel &lt;em&gt;From Slaughter's Mountain&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 29 &amp;ndash; A book everyone hated but you liked&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;maybe a lot of what i read would fall under this. maybe most obviously some of the classics like &lt;em&gt;Moby Dick&lt;/em&gt; by Herman Melville?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Day 30 &amp;ndash; Your favourite book of all time&lt;/strong&gt;:&amp;nbsp;i used to be able to say &lt;em&gt;Les Miserables&lt;/em&gt; without reservation, but it really depends on my mood. right now i keep &lt;em&gt;Mariette in Ecstasy&lt;/em&gt; by Ron Hansen by my bedside along with  &lt;em&gt;Silk&lt;/em&gt; by Alessandro Barrico, &lt;em&gt;Cycle of the Werewolf&lt;/em&gt; by Stephen King, and &lt;em&gt;Einstein's Dreams&lt;/em&gt; by Alan Lightman. does that make them my favorite? i actually haven't read &lt;em&gt;The Red Badge of Courage&lt;/em&gt; in over a year, but i think it might be close to no. 1. that's pretty good for a book i hated quite passionately in high school.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;:&amp;nbsp;D&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=297029" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:296881</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/296881.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=296881"/>
    <title>happy all hallow's ~ !</title>
    <published>2009-10-31T15:20:25Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-31T15:20:25Z</updated>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7296/15553493.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ray Bradbury's painting for &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Halloween Tree, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;1960&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: left;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;as promised, my new blog kicks off with the &lt;em&gt;Ghost Rider&lt;/em&gt; series at &lt;a href="http://comicbookchronicles.weebly.com"&gt;Comic Book Chronicles&lt;/a&gt;.  meanwhile, i know many of you are feverishly doing last-minute plotting and planning for the NaNoWriMo kick-off tomorrow:&amp;nbsp;good luck! i'm likewise going to challenge myself this coming month, but haven't decided on the particulars of the challenge yet. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i hope everyone enjoys a safe and fun halloween ~ !&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=296881" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:296031</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/296031.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=296031"/>
    <title>desk duty ~</title>
    <published>2009-10-24T18:23:31Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-24T18:23:31Z</updated>
    <category term="desk"/>
    <category term="paper dolls"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/5929/desk10242009.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: left;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;october is almost over and i haven't posted a picture of my desk! so here it is as of this morning. earlier i was working on&lt;em&gt; Reconstruction&lt;/em&gt;, but after painting two pages, i switched over to work on the paper dolls that i want to finish for Halloween. i finished two first outfits for the &lt;em&gt;Ghost Rider&lt;/em&gt; characters (their initial clothes from &lt;em&gt;Marvel Spotlight&lt;/em&gt; no. 5, which is Ghost Rider's first appearance). and now i'm noodling with the &lt;em&gt;Swamp Thing&lt;/em&gt; characters who are proving a larger challenge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i've got Abby down okay and i even think i managed to get a fairly good Alec going (though all the little mossy details will be painful), but i am totally struggling with Constantine. i have an idea in my head of what i want him to look like, but haven't been able to capture it yet. it may take me a while. and by God he &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; have cigarettes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i've decided to commit to this idea of setting up a paper doll blog to go through these series and draw all of their clothes (Alec will be the easiest ~&amp;nbsp;har). it'll be fun and give me an opportunity to re-read the books (it's been more than fifteen years, i think i mentioned before). and there will be a lot of issues that have no costume variations whatsoever, but chronicling the journey seems like a nice side distraction to keep me from going blitheringly crazy with &lt;em&gt;Reconstruction&lt;/em&gt; (working on that sometimes just puts me in a dark mood). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;to spare my non-comic-book flist peeps from my obsessive prattling on about this stuff (because i know i can &lt;em&gt;definitely go on&lt;/em&gt;), i am setting up the aforementioned blog elsewhere, and will just periodically make announcements about what's going on over there.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;hope everyone is having a happy sattidy!&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=296031" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:294966</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/294966.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=294966"/>
    <title>Lester says eh ~</title>
    <published>2009-10-18T17:47:19Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-18T17:47:19Z</updated>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <category term="process"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/2111/combotest2.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;i dream in black and white. sometimes i can perceive color (i know a truck is red, for example), but usually that's just a perception ~ the dream itself usually has no color. occasionally it will have spot color (i dreamt of being a photojournalist trying to break some story in Iraq and being chased inside a huge scientific military complex. there was an escalator and as i descended, a giant koi was swimming in the air before me. the koi was every color of the rainbow ~ stuff like that). i know other people dream this way too. i wonder if is has anything to do with my inability to learn color theory....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;but i digress. the point of this post was to make an announcement. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;it's official:&amp;nbsp;my long violent war with color and color theory and coloring is at an end. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;in case you are wondering, nobody won. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;meanwhile, we have to bury the dead ~ which amounts to six pages of art that i will be posting in installments starting tomorrow and running &lt;strong&gt;daily&lt;/strong&gt; through November 7th. these are very much &lt;em&gt;tweener&lt;/em&gt; pages in which the coloring style is going to do some mutating. at the end, the new style will hopefully not be too much of a sudden shock but it will possibly be somewhat more monochromatic (which is about all the color i can handle). Fortunately this is not an art style change in terms of the drawing ~&amp;nbsp;just the coloring, i promise.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;also, the good news is:&amp;nbsp;if all goes well, &lt;a href="http://www.webcomicsnation.com/lookingland/reconstruction/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Reconstruction&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; will continue to post daily instead of just M-Th from here on out. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;please remember ~ in spite of my cartoony art style, this series is intended for mature readers and even though it's been pretty pg-rated tame since i began in august, it won't always be SFW (ooo, i used a blogging acronym. i feel so hip). if you need warnings for weeks in which stuff is NSFW, let me know and i will post cautions in advance. if you need to know all the ways in which this story is going to turn down dark paths, please &lt;a href="http://lookingland.com/reconstruction.php?itemid=285"&gt;read this&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;questions?&amp;nbsp;qualms?&amp;nbsp;wondering where that newly named pony is?&amp;nbsp;i'm so far ahead in the drawing, you won't see the pony until november (sorry!).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;hope everyone is having a happy weekend!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;:&amp;nbsp;D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=294966" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:294746</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/294746.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=294746"/>
    <title>son of markers: return of the nib!</title>
    <published>2009-10-03T17:53:26Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-03T17:53:26Z</updated>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <category term="process"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img alt="" src="http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/4605/markerteaser.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;i went ahead and spent some money and got a handful of markers to give 'em a go. i have mixed feelings of joy and trepidation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;things i like:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;consistency of color.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;no streaks/ease of blending.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;no buckling on the paper.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;it gives my work polish that i just can't seem to get with paint because of my tentativeness.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;things that concern me:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Learning to use them. they color pretty no matter what you do with them, which is great, but i don't want to get too sloppy. also, while i like the brush nibs very much, somehow i can't control them as well as an actual brush with paint. i keep wandering out of the lines.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;cost (?). i bought more colors than I probably really need, though ~ over time i will figure out a palette.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;colors! zooks, i'm bad at choosing colors. i chose out of the &amp;quot;sepia&amp;quot; family, figuring i'd trust it to be, well, sepia (as i know it), but it's awfully bright. it's not that big of a deal because i can adjust the saturation on the computer (as i did above), but i'd like to figure out a truer color match eventually.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;this is all so bizarre. i could color for (technically) free if i just did it on the computer, where i have bajillions of colors at my disposal and can erase my mistakes. but... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;it's all about the artifact. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;if i don't have something i can hold in my hand, i don't love it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;at any rate, i colored four pages this morning before noon ~&amp;nbsp;fastest coloring job &lt;em&gt;ever&lt;/em&gt;. that alone is worth a lot. now i can spend the rest of the weekend working on totally new stuff! yay!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;hope everyone is having a great weekend!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;:&amp;nbsp;D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;p.s. the panel above is from a page you won't see until october 12th, i think. please note the dreaded corn field!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=294746" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:294412</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/294412.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=294412"/>
    <title>i know i shouldn't say this, but ~</title>
    <published>2009-09-29T13:36:58Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-29T13:36:58Z</updated>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">i really want some markers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/4118/copich.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i'm not entirely sure why. i've never had much interest in them before. found some Design markers (a discontinued brand) from about twenty years ago (i'm not kidding, i'm pretty sure i bought them in 1988). not only do they &lt;i&gt;still work&lt;/i&gt; (God loves alcohol-based markers!), but they're kind of cool and i was playing with them and thinking about all the possibilities. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and the colors!  oh man, the colors are so dang vivid!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the copic markers (above) are professional-quality and super expensive (yarg!), but i was thinking about getting a cheaper brand just to play with. &lt;a href="http://www.dickblick.com"&gt;Blick&lt;/a&gt; makes a very cheap student-grade set and i have a 30%-off coupon and i am very tempted. i want something that doesn't streak, blends well, and doesn't bleed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;unfortunately, i have learned the long way around that there are some things you shouldn't skimp on. hair products (especially when you have as much hair as i do), and art supplies. a Blick set of 24 would cost me about $30. a copic set of 36? $125. it sounds horrendous, but these babies sell for more than $5 a pop, so a set of 36 for $125ish is a pretty fabulous deal. i could just buy a handful of singles, but my coupon is for one item only, so a set would make better sense. prismacolor also makes sets....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and then it just gets too confusing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;sigh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;yeah. purty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=294412" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:294319</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/294319.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=294319"/>
    <title>itchy ~</title>
    <published>2009-09-28T15:17:06Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-28T15:17:06Z</updated>
    <category term="bibliophilia"/>
    <category term="in pursuance"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">had trouble sitting still this weekend. painted couple of pages (really need to do more, though), scanned some stuff, rearranged a few of my books (they may start cannibalizing each other at any moment due to overcrowding), and came up with at least twenty ideas for cool things to do or make that aren't exactly on my schedule, like adapt the über-ridiculous overblown, gratuitous, slightly nauseating poem &lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/praesidicidebatt00hylt"&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Praesidicide&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; for the stage. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hylton's 6,000+ line epic poem (in the first-person voice of J.W. Booth himself) may have the dubious distinction of being the first piece of Lincoln Assassination fan fiction published (within the year of the deed ~ beating out Townsend's &lt;i&gt;Katy of Catoctin&lt;/i&gt; by decades). if anyone knows of any literary effort on the subject published in that period, feel free to bring it to my attention ~ the more, the merrier, right?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;in other &lt;i&gt;Pursuance&lt;/i&gt; news (it's been a while since i've blogged about this temporarily dormant project), over the course of the summer i acquired yet more books on the subject for my ever-growing collection, including the prize find of a copy of George Porter's prison diary (&lt;i&gt;The Surgeon in Charge&lt;/i&gt;). it's incredibly rare and i got it for an absolute steal ~ $15 on amazon. someone wasn't minding the store, i guess). i've only ever seen one other copy for sale and it sold for $75.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i also bought Geary's &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Abraham-Lincoln-Treasury-Victorian-Graphic/dp/1561634263/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1254145772&amp;amp;sr=8-4"&gt;Murder of Abraham Lincoln&lt;/a&gt; at ComicCon. I would have got Geary to sign it (he signed my &lt;i&gt;Jack the Ripper&lt;/i&gt;), but alas he was nowhere to be found this year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;finally, i found a cheap copy of Jampoleer's &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Last-Lincoln-Conspirator-Surratts-Gallows/dp/1591144086/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1254146172&amp;amp;sr=1-1"&gt;Last Lincoln Conspirator&lt;/a&gt;, which i still think is pretty dang solid book for being an overwritten subject. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i continue to keep my eyes peeled for a cheap copies of the various histories of the 4th Pennsylvania Cavalry (alas no luck and they seem to be getting rarer, fetching about $40-$60 a piece), as well as Arno Press's published transcript (which i've only ever seen one volume for sale ~ for $100, though someone bought it). the copy of &lt;i&gt;John Wilkes Booth, Himself&lt;/i&gt; that i have been eying for some time also jumped in price this past year, up $85 to a whopping $375 (geh! i'm crazy, but i'm not &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; crazy!), and no cheap copies of Kimmel's &lt;i&gt;Mad Booths of Maryland&lt;/i&gt; nor Bates' &lt;i&gt;Lincoln in the Telegraph Office&lt;/i&gt; have presented themselves (the going price on each is about $60 for a decent copy). if i weren't so dang picky about the editions, i might have already bought copies of some of these things, but, well, there you have it. all too rich for anyone's blood, frankly. i paid $70 for my first copy of Doster's &lt;i&gt;Lincoln and Episodes of the Civil War&lt;/i&gt; (and much less for the second copy), but only because it's my favorite non-fiction book ever and i still intend to be buried with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and yes, occasionally i buy groceries, though i confess i haven't really bought many new clothes except the occasional pair of jeans and a shirt in &lt;i&gt;years&lt;/i&gt;. i flinch at paying more than $10 for a blouse, but waft a $20 book of my desire under my nose and it's a bargain!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and i need another bookcase so bad, but if i spend money on a bookcase, how can i buy more books???&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;it's all a conundrum. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/756/ln0082i52561f815c8a5df.jpg"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"In Memory of Abraham Lincoln: &lt;br /&gt;The Reward of the Just" &lt;br /&gt;D. T. Weist, 1865&lt;br /&gt;from &lt;a href="http://www.lincolnat200.org/exhibits/show/nowhebelongs/memory/apotheosis"&gt;Lincoln at 200&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=294319" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:293913</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/293913.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=293913"/>
    <title>getting into the swing ~ </title>
    <published>2009-09-24T13:05:18Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-24T13:05:18Z</updated>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <category term="desk"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">so in case you haven't noticed, I'm trying to get back into the swing of blogging. a while back i suggested (to myself) that i would try to give myself a blogging schedule and have different topics every other day or so. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;one of the obvious choices of topics is my desk. i can't imagine torturing you with a weekly image of the rats' nest that it is (yes, we've recovered from the &lt;a href="http://lookingland.livejournal.com/311676.html"&gt;empty void&lt;/a&gt; that was last may ~ yikes! what a difference a season makes, eh?). but a monthly post might be in order (in lieu of me rambling on about working on x, y, or z, perhaps). so here it is for September (late in the month, but this picture was actually taken about two weeks ago).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/5997/desk092009.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;other obvious choices for blogging are book reviews, film reviews, historical blitherage. i'm hoping by the beginning of october, i will have it figured out.if any of you have idea about what you would like to see blogged about on your flist, i'll surely consider requests!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;~ * ~&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font size="1"&gt;p.s. i am still working diligently on &lt;a href="http://www.lookingland.com/reconstruction.php"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Reconstruction&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, though bogged down around p. 34. whatever i was thinking when i made Gwilym Fletcher a corn farmer, i clearly wasn't considering what torture it would be to have to draw all that frakkin' corn. is it too late to switch the &lt;a href="http://www.oldgloryprints.com/lonestar.jpg"&gt;Antietam cornfield&lt;/a&gt; to some other battle as one of the pivotal moments of the story?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i think i hate corn.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=293913" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:293686</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/293686.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=293686"/>
    <title>autumn and all that ~</title>
    <published>2009-09-22T22:08:11Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-22T22:08:11Z</updated>
    <category term="s. weir mitchell"/>
    <category term="in pursuance"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/leaves falling/qween_meeh/fall_leaves.jpg?o=1" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa260/qween_meeh/fall_leaves.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the weather is finally deciding to turn (at long last and alleluia!). of course that means my brain is kicking into high gear over a dozen projects i want to get cracking on. among these projects, i had this idea that i would really love to adapt s. weir mitchell's &lt;i&gt;Summer of St. Martin&lt;/i&gt; into a comic form. i have &lt;a href="http://lookingland.livejournal.com/238792.html"&gt;blogged about&lt;/a&gt; this story before, and while there's nothing particularly exciting about the basic plot, the story sticks with me because it's sweet and very autumny, and so just right for the season. it also appeals to me as a challenge because it's nothing but a conversation between two people who are sitting on a bench in a forest in which the leaves are falling all around them (it's all very romantic). it would certainly give me an opportunity to work on the nuances of character expressions, etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;like i have the time. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;filed away in my "big list of graphic adaptations" are a number of horrifically complex projects. &lt;a href="http://lookingland.livejournal.com/tag/in+pursuance"&gt;&lt;i&gt;In Pursuance of Said Conspiracy&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; remains among them ~ along with this demented fantasy i have had since a long time ago in which i am determined to do a graphic novel adaptation of the &lt;a href="http://www.puffin.creighton.edu/jesuit/relations/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Jesuit Relations&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ~ which i still think would be awesome and i have all &lt;i&gt;manner&lt;/i&gt; of ideas for it, but oh my! what an undertaking &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; would be! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;so yeah. i don't know where mitchell falls into this. it would be a short piece (24 pages would cover it, i think), so maybe more reasonable than those larger, more ambitious projects. but still, it's not as though i don't have a ton of work already on my plate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;oh sigh. if i had millions of dollars i would hire an army of artists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;guess i better go get a lottery ticket.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=293686" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:293489</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/293489.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=293489"/>
    <title>An evening with Eddie Campbell ~ </title>
    <published>2009-09-19T18:05:46Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-19T18:05:46Z</updated>
    <category term="inspiration"/>
    <category term="bibliophilia"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/1174/campbellblackdiamond.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last night I read &lt;a href="http://eddiecampbell.blogspot.com/"&gt;Eddie Campbell&lt;/a&gt;'s &lt;i&gt;Black Diamond Detective Agency&lt;/i&gt;, which is fairly new from &lt;a href="http://firstsecondbooks.typepad.com"&gt;First Second Books&lt;/a&gt; (which produces some really amazing works!). I was too overwhelmed at Comic Con this year to visit Campbell (I think my brother said he was there, but I never crossed paths with his table). So alas, I did not get a signed copy, but I'm glad to have bought a copy at all. Campbell was the first "comic" artist who inspired me to think that I could actually draw (probably &lt;i&gt;From Hell&lt;/i&gt; was one of the first graphic novels I ever saw aside from Spiegelman that had a distinctive art style that wasn't traditional superheroes. I immediately fell in love with his inks and washes and later developed a similar affinity for his watercolors. &lt;i&gt;Black Diamond Detective Agency&lt;/i&gt; is one of only a few full-color books of his, and I love the gritty palette he's chosen for the end of the 19th century ~ it goes well with the industrial aspects of the storyline and keeps the tone somber and noirish) like a detective book should be, right?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There's problems with the script, I think. I mean, the story is good: exploding train, missing wife, framed mystery man, even a good old-fashioned chase in a gas-saturated mine. But given another twenty pages or so, some of the more crashing scene changes and bafflingly curt dialog might have flowed more smoothly. There's also some lengthy explanations at the end: wherein the villain explains all ~ very Victorian in construction so I'll give it props for the formula, but as Campbell was working from a script by C. Gaby Mitchell and perhaps either as a difficulty of editing or a limitation of space, certain information and character development feels a wee crammed up. Or it could just be that I wanted to savor the book longer (or ghoulishly wanted more 'splosions, which is always a possibility). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nevertheless, this is a beautiful little book and I hope we'll see more like it. I tried (perhaps in a desultory fashion given my awareness of my own personal artistic limitations), to emulate this style in at least one incarnation of &lt;a href="http://www.lookingland.com/reconstruction.php"&gt;Reconstruction&lt;/a&gt;. It didn't work out. But I'm glad to be able to admire the work here ~ even if it's something I can't reproduce, it continues to inspire. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/9926/blackdiamonddetective02.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=293489" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:293266</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/293266.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=293266"/>
    <title>oh look a movie review (of sorts)</title>
    <published>2009-09-15T12:06:37Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-15T12:06:37Z</updated>
    <category term="film"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/2338/mv5bmtg4nta4mdk3mf5bml5.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;so this weekend i watched &lt;i&gt;Jude&lt;/i&gt;, a film made in 1996 (yeah, i guess i'm a little behind on this one since i'd never heard of it), starring kate winslet and christopher eccleston. the film is based on a thomas hardy novel called &lt;i&gt;Jude the Obscure&lt;/i&gt;, and like all of hardy's novels is a cheerful romp through late 19th century english social ills. so cheerful, in fact, that i can't imagine why anybody would want to make such a film; the story is downright &lt;i&gt;treacle&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;any of you who know hardy's work know that hardy wasn't one for a happy ending, so don't expect one here. in fact, i think i only finished watching this because i ghoulishly wanted to see how they would play out the ending (not that i thought they would change it, but more that i was curious as to what they would show). it's a spoiler, but there's a murder suicide toward the end that even if i warn you about it here, it'll probably shock you if you decide to watch the film.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;anyway, the performances here are excellent and the driving force behind an otherwise drab horrorshow of misery, disappointment, poverty, and despair. there's also some fairly graphic sex which is sorta necessary for the story and well done, so i won't fault it too much (though a more gratuitous birthing scene later on is something i totally could have lived without!). the palette is very drab. england looks english ~ which is to say very grey. in keeping with this temper, perhaps, the costumes are very understated. there's very little color here and for this being the height of the most opulent part of the victorian era, the dresses in particular seem rather plain. it's all good and well for kate as poor sue bridehead, but wealthy arabella wears very plain black (okay she's in morning, but it's arabella ~ does she really care?). i think the only dress with any splash is arabella's bar costume. so on the one hand a bit of a disappointment there, but on the other, nice to see some plain clothes and to get away from the glamorous set for a change from most period pieces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a thoroughly depressing, well-made film. i can only guess the filmmaker was wanting to make a comment about the nature and definition of marriage. i almost wish that if this was (as i speculate) a soapbox against anti-gay-marriage laws, that the filmmaker would have went ahead, been more bold, and adapted the story making the two principles into two gay men or something. i dunno. hardy just straight up is pretty much a drag.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;: o p&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=293266" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:292168</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/292168.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=292168"/>
    <title>today i present ~ </title>
    <published>2009-08-30T16:52:55Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-30T16:52:55Z</updated>
    <category term="film"/>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <category term="paper dolls"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">socks ~ !&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/3607/socks.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the weather is turning and i had a long day of on and off fighting with the &lt;i&gt;Reconstruction&lt;/i&gt; project (and mostly winning, so it's all good), but i thought i should take a little break and work on something else for a while just to get my energy back up. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i could have washed dishes or sorted the laundry or cleaned the bathroom, but that'd be boring, so i tried to watch &lt;i&gt;Lost&lt;/i&gt; (everyone and their mother has recommended it to me). i settled in with a frosty Coke and popcorn, put on the pilot, and enjoyed all the way up to where they shoot the polar bear in the second episode. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i wasn't bothered by the polar bear. i was strangely bothered by most of the behavior of the survivors. of course it's a tv show and we have to expedite the shock and horror and move onto monsters and adventure and mystery and all of that, but...i dunno. the expedition leading to the polar bear sorta did it in for me. first of all, they take shannon, who's totally useless physically ~ and they do it knowing there's a people-eating critter in the jungle. of course, she speaks French, so that makes it okay. secondly, they are on a hunt for water (allegedly), but don't appear to have any means for carrying water. what are they going to do, find it, drink some, then come back and say: yep, there's water! likewise, it just &lt;i&gt;rained&lt;/i&gt;. does nobody think to maybe set something up to catch rainwater?  they are equally careless salvaging stuff from the cockpit and...wait a minute...there's a man-eating critter snacking on the pilot, but they decide to &lt;i&gt;run&lt;/i&gt; from the cockpit instead of stay inside where it might actually be safe? oy vey!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;anyway, i was perfectly okay just flowing with all that nonsense until Sawyer pulled out the gun and had his little contretemps with Sayid. instantly i hated Sawyer as a character and dreaded the thought of suffering through untold number of episodes of this guy making trouble for no real reason at all. i took a desultory stab at finishing through the third episode, but it's over for me. i don't like any of the characters enough to stick with it. Hurley and Claire were about as interesting as it got, and i guess Jack was okay, but i didn't like the actor playing him. the rest of them were just cardboard to me. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the show is well put together, but doesn't do it for me, alas. i might give it another go when winter gets dark and cold and there's nothing else to watch. eh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;anyway, so i gave up on that and started digitally painting paper dolls (naturally). and above are some adorable socks to prove it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;hope everyone is still enjoying their weekend!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;: D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=292168" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:291959</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/291959.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=291959"/>
    <title>One of these days I'll figure out this promotion thing ~ </title>
    <published>2009-08-28T15:09:09Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-28T15:09:09Z</updated>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>2</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">yesterday we concluded the second week of M-Th regular posting of &lt;a href="http://www.lookingland.com/reconstruction.php"&gt;Reconstruction&lt;/a&gt;. this morning I was doing a little cleanup, including making the scene notes a little more detailed, link-filled, and prettier. i think it's not readily apparent that each scene has a notes section because you have to click on the "read more" from the home page to view it. i might need to do something to make it more obvious?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;likewise, it's hard to know how much to include in the notes. no spoilers for the story, of course, but how much historical droning is relevant? or how much production bibbling do you want to hear about. i guess no one is forced to read it, but i don't want to make it tedious either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;anyway!  this week we started a new scene that will run through next week. these opening moments are sorta flash-in-the-pan. we're going to get into longer sequences very soon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;anyway, enjoy and i certainly welcome your input here, there, wherever, if you have suggestions, comments, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;happy friday all!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=291959" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:291592</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/291592.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=291592"/>
    <title>learning as i go ~ </title>
    <published>2009-08-22T22:25:43Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-22T22:25:43Z</updated>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/3522/statesgcpost.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i can't believe it's been a week since i last posted! i've been working, keeping very busy, trying to build up a buffer. i'm on page 14, so it's going slow, but going. there's so much about digital painting that i'm figuring out along the way that i'm sure the first hundred pages or so are going to be ranging all over the map. style-wise i think there's really only one thing i'm capable of doing, so this is how it's going to look, though it's unfortunately got too much of a &lt;a href="http://requiem.seraph-inn.com/"&gt;Phoenix Requiem&lt;/a&gt;-looking influence going. that was totally unintentional. i still really wanted something that looks more like the scribble above, but i seem incapable of scribbling consistently, so there you have it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and speaking of the above scribble, this was a quickie study i did for a panel on page 13. i like the scribble better than how the painted version came out, so i'm posting this here for my own contemplation. but i won't fixate because that just leads down bad paths.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;anyway, we're through the first week of m-th posts! it's been fun writing and drawing the Georgetown College scene that's coming up next week. as a result i have (not surprisingly, to anyone who knows me well enough) revamped the story structure quite a bit. alas, there won't be any exploding heads just yet, but i promise they'll come sooner than in the original plan, so just hang onto your hats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;if you haven't visited the site and seen the week's posts, you can see them all &lt;a href="http://www.lookingland.com/reconstruction.php"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;hope everyone is having a great, productive weekend!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=291592" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:291345</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/291345.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=291345"/>
    <title>i just don't know when to stop ~ </title>
    <published>2009-08-14T00:28:41Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-14T00:28:41Z</updated>
    <category term="process"/>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/5412/toomuchpost.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the above picture is about the size of a business card (tiny), and when reproduced, it will prolly be even smaller, and yet i put entirely too much time and detail into it (ridiculously so ~ the faces were excruciating). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i'm not exactly sorry that i did because it's an all right picture and i like detail (like the ribbing on Lester Dunne's socks), but if I've got to produce 2-3 pages a week, i can't really afford to spent three days painting only a handful of panels. granted, it's been hot and i've not been feeling like working, but that no excuse for spending what little work time i've had on a single panel!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;so yeah. i feel like i need to be cautious of setting a dangerous precedent for expectations that i doubt i can meet consistently.  and of course there's another part of me looking at this and thinking: oh wait, i forgot to add the embroidery to Morse's vest. doh!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;launch is in three days. i have a ton of work to do still.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;hope everyone out there is well!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;: D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=291345" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:290138</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/290138.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=290138"/>
    <title>learning as i go ~ </title>
    <published>2009-08-05T22:21:52Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-05T22:21:52Z</updated>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <category term="painting"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1986/recontestpost.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i painted this panel this morning. sometimes something just comes out right and you can't help be pleased by it. i'm still pretty tentative with the paints overall, but i have confidence for doing the faces (for the most part), which helps. I'm learning some things not to do and browsing around this afternoon, got some tips on things i can improve (many in the "wow, maybe you should read a basic primer on painting with watercolors!" department). this is one of the problems of being self-taught when you are an incredibly lazy student.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;at any rate, i just wanted to share the progress. you will start seeing these pages in all their full glory starting on August 16th.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;: D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=290138" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:289510</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/289510.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=289510"/>
    <title>in the grip of the mung ~ </title>
    <published>2009-07-31T17:27:06Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-31T17:27:06Z</updated>
    <category term="process"/>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>4</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">home sick today. this is unfortunate because i have a bazillion things to do and am hacking and sighing too much to do any of them. the house is a horrendous disaster and i desperately need to do laundry. the good news is that i managed to dress, put a hat on my greasy head, and wander out to the farmer's market up the street so that i could buy fresh veggies with which to make a cauldron of leek soup. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/5826/soup.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;in case you didn't know it, leek soup is the 9th wonder of the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;despite the mung, i am going to try to get a good pile of work done. july is at long last over and i can throw myself headlong into working on &lt;i&gt;Reconstruction&lt;/i&gt;. i have the first twenty pages (more or less) completed, which is quite the buffer, but i don't want to let the line go slack because i'm going to be posting 4 days a week (monday through thursday) and that buffer is going to get eaten up quick!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;yes, you read that right: i'm posting updates monday through thursday with extras on the weekends (perhaps). it's only a slightly brutal schedule, but i decided on it because if i force myself to draw every day i'm hoping i will let go of some of the inhibitions that have kept me from being faithful to this project over the years. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;this also means you will be seeing some wildly inconsistent artwork and i am trying to be okay with that. this isn't "real" artwork, after all, right? it's just a storyboard. so i hope you will be forgiving at least. and know that things will even off once i get into a rhythm with it all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;meanwhile, i will share with you this teaser. some of you had seen the digital version of this image. this is the "redo" in watercolor. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img54.imageshack.us/img54/4139/teaser01.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i'm really looking forward to the August 16th launch date. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;now i must eat my soup and try to shake off the pall of mung so that i can be productive this weekend. if i have to be sick and it means i get a three-day weekend, then i had better make the best of it. later, there will pomegranate ice cream. naturally.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;happy friday all!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;: D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=289510" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:288940</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/288940.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=288940"/>
    <title>summer reading</title>
    <published>2009-06-11T12:26:29Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-11T12:51:22Z</updated>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">great ~&amp;nbsp;i just spent half an hour writing up a post about my summer reading and DW ate it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;thus endeth any attempts at blogging.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;see you august, all!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;:&amp;nbsp;o p&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=288940" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:286990</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/286990.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=286990"/>
    <title>Watch this!</title>
    <published>2009-05-08T20:54:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-08T20:55:35Z</updated>
    <category term="film"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>6</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/629/inspingenuity.png" width="500"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I thought I better turn in my "I saw the new &lt;i&gt;Star Trek&lt;/i&gt; movie report. This is generally spoiler-free.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First off, I can't imagine how difficult it is for an actor to play another actor's character. while there's a little bit of room for doing your own thing, it's the moments when you nail it that it really works. Zachary Quinto was phenomenal as a different kind of Spock (though I confess: at first I had a hard time seeing him as anyone but Sylar from &lt;i&gt;Heroes&lt;/i&gt;). Chris Pine was okay as Kirk. The final scene was the only real moment of recognition for me, though there were other moments where he was really trying. McCoy was dead-on in some moments, less so in others. Scotty was also excellent. I feel more ambivalent about Chekov (the voice was spot-on, but the hair was distracting), Sulu (generally good, but nothing particularly amazing), and Uhura (I think they felt the need to "empower" the character; she looked great, but I didn't feel a connection; also, there's some plot stuff with her that's maybe too weird).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The plot is good, but gives lots of room to complain. Some of it is a little facile and silly (but then so was the TV show). I think the writers wanted to create something new without violating the canon). I think they succeeded (and what a monumental task, considering!). There were a few things here and there that I snerfed at, but overall it was a rollicking good ride, lots of stuff blew up, there was plenty of good humor, and it was an opportunity for a new adventure with characters I love. A lot of it is origin stuff, so I'd like to see a sequel, though this is the last &lt;i&gt;Star Trek&lt;/i&gt; that will ever feature Majel Barrett (she's in every incarnation of the show ever made). And who knows how long Leonard Nimoy will last. His role in this was just right and exactly needed to make the passing of the baton work. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Die-hards will likely call foul on &lt;i&gt;many&lt;/i&gt; a detail, but I've always been an easy fan (which is why I never liked &lt;i&gt;Next Generation&lt;/i&gt;: it was too snobby for my goofy "space western" tastes).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's worth a watch whether you're an old fan or never even saw an episode in all your life. That's a pretty major accomplishment, so overall I give it the thumbs up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;: D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=286990" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:184634:286563</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/286563.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://lookingland.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=286563"/>
    <title>weekend wrap-up</title>
    <published>2009-05-04T13:44:40Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-05T12:11:01Z</updated>
    <category term="desk"/>
    <category term="reconstruction"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>3</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">i haven't posted a picture of my desk in forever. mostly because i haven't been working at my desk and there's been nothing to see. even in this picture, you can see how sort of scattershot it is. i don't even remember why i have all the glue out (maybe i ought to put it away, you think?)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/7421/desk052009.jpg"&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;this weekend i managed to get a bunch of stuff done in spite of frittering my time on watching movies (among them: &lt;i&gt;Crossing Over&lt;/i&gt;, which I recommend!), spinning about the usual quandaries, eating popcorn, and spending much of saturday running around at booksales and Cinco de Mayo festivities. a good time was had by all and very little damage was done to the pocketbook.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i also want to say that after &lt;i&gt;20 freakin' years&lt;/i&gt; my character's been lugging around a &lt;a href="http://www.sutlers.co.uk/acatalog/ColtNavyYank.jpg"&gt;Navy Colt&lt;/a&gt;, i officially switched it to a &lt;a href="http://www.thespiritoftheoldwest.com/NewImages/Handgun-ColtDragoon-right.JPG"&gt;Colt Dragoon&lt;/a&gt; this weekend. i had always wanted a heavier, more ridiculous firearm with a larger caliber (.44 instead of .36) ~ the dragoon is perfect. thanks, &lt;a href="http://jamiekswriter.livejournal.com/"&gt;jamie&lt;/a&gt;, it's &lt;i&gt;entirely&lt;/i&gt; your fault. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src="http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/8330/dragoonr.jpg"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;image for an up-coming scene&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;it's a good thing the dragoon shares a lot of similarities with the navy variety. it made drawing this one much easier than i suspected!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;: D&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=lookingland&amp;ditemid=286563" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
